« And He’s Outta Here………….. | Main | Begging For Bloggers………. »
May 08, 2005
The “F” Word……….
It’s time for all of us to start using the “F” word when talking about our not-so- recent selection election.
Now some bloggers have been using an “F” word for months….just not the one I am thinking of. In fact a couple of them are rather famous for using it about every other word. You know who you are.
The F word I am thinking of is fraud.
Because that’s what all of this is……… Fraud.
And why is it that it is perfectly acceptable here in Washington to accept fraud as normal and unavoidable?
Is it alright to have an election that is rife with fraud and poisoned with half truths from half wits, as long as your candidate wins?
Is that what all of you that think our election was a model for the Country are trying to tell us?
The end justifies the means?
Because it doesn’t……….ever.
Honest people never want to gain or win anything by dishonest means. Never.
And, though I may be beating a dead horse here, what in the heck does your party of choice have to do with how an election should be run anyway? Isn’t everyone supposed to be elected in exactly the same manner? Isn’t that called equity? And isn’t that an important part of our society and Judicial system?
And, please, you loons, save the baloney about how biased people are that noticed that Judge Greer has an earring. I completely agree with the idea that it is not okay for a Superior Court Judge to be wearing an earring.
It’s called propriety.
He has to wear a robe for the same reason and it worries me that he thinks that he can personally rewrite the general dress code for Judges. Isn’t this one of the biggest problems with Judges anyway? An overblown idea of their personal power and importance……that seem to color their every decision.
Let’s not forget our Supreme Court Justice that thought it was her right to drive drunk….and she is still on the bench.
I will say it again….with very few exceptions, Judges are nothing more than a politician and a lawyer rolled up in a robe. Period.
They are not infallible, they are not God…..and sadly it seems here in Washington most of the time they aren’t even close to being right.
How about that latest, and craziest, decision that someone can’t be charged with murder unless the State can prove that they really intended to kill. So now the entire State has evolved into Clinton-land where the only thing that matters is what you felt or meant….not the outcome.
You just can’t get any more ridiculous than that……..
So the next time you get lectured by someone ,or read it in the paper, or hear it on the "talk radios" that the Republicans that are challenging this crazy election are partisans on a fool’s errand…..stand up for yourself and what is right and tell the dishonest or confused person/people what you really think.
Kipling called it “Twisting the truth to make a trap for fools”…….
And if it works that way this whole State has become a giant roach motel….
Liberals check in and [alas] they don’t check out……….
Posted by ChristmasGhost at May 8, 2005 05:11 PM
Useful? Then Digg It.
Trackback Pings
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.christmasghost.com/cgi-bin/mt/mt-t.cgi/13
Comments
A Judge sentenced a woman to jail time for not keeping her dog from running loose. A woman was awarded $45,000 because a neighbors dog killed her cat. Another woman was "released" with no bail at her arraignment after she finally confessed to beating her 5 year old step daughter to death. 2 months later.
Thats our Judiciary.
Posted by: chardonnay at May 9, 2005 09:14 AM
I admit I was one of the ones that said I did not believe that this last election was not fraudulent but incompetence at the election offices themselves. I have to admit after Ron Sims in his short little speech accepting errors as OK and then Christine Gregoire saying that we should just moved on it appears that fraud is the correct word to use .
Posted by: rightwingbob at May 8, 2005 10:42 PM
Bank of America has an ad running currently that states that one error in a MILLION transactions is unacceptably high. although at Norm Rice's Home Loan Bank, the KC Elections error rate might have been "acceptable". democrats have interesting views on what number of errors is "acceptable" in a "model election".
Posted by: robbed at May 8, 2005 09:47 PM
Post a comment
Thanks for signing in, . Now you can comment. (sign out)
(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)